Plath and the Periodic Table

PrincetonScienceTeacher53
Princeton chemistry professor Hubert Alyea in 1953

I’m teaching The Bell Jar this week in my “Desperate Domesticity” class on the American 1950s. And what strikes me this time around is English major Esther Greenwood’s adventures in physics and chemistry (they culminate Chapter 3). Call it Plath’s periodic fable of women and STEM in the era of “rocket girls” and rocket bras.

BlondePlath1955
Sylvia Plath in 1955

A straight-A student, Esther found her first day of physics class rather ghastly as soon as her professor went to the blackboard: Then he started talking about let A equal acceleration and let T equal time and suddenly he was scribbling letters and numbers and equals signs all over the blackboard and my mind went dead. Wallace Stevens’s enigmatic line Let be be finale of seem in “The Emperor of Ice Cream” was infinitely easier. And so, apparently, was James Joyce’s notoriously difficult Finnegans Wake, the topic Esther would pursue in her honors thesis. Esther studied the STEM hieroglyphics of scorpion-lettered formulas. She mastered the 400-page textbook her professor had produced to explain physics to college girls–a terrifying tome composed of diagrams and more formulas.

 

Esther aced that physics class, showing that women had more to offer the atomic age than nuclear families. But she would rather launch a book than join the Space Age rocket girls. And she wants a vibrant life in which she can shoot off in all directions myself, like the colored arrows from a Fourth of July rocket.

periodictablechalkboardSo Esther devised a plan to just audit the chemistry class. The same professor used the periodic table of elements in which all the perfectly good words like gold and silver and cobalt and aluminum were shortened to ugly abbreviations with different decimal numbers after them. The materiality of these elements was, for her, the materiality of language.

She wrote villanelles and sonnets during her chemistry lectures, foregoing milliliters and milligrams for the metrical and rhythmic formulas of poetry–mirroring Plath’s own apprenticeship to poetic form. If Esther Greenwood felt STEMrolled by the physical sciences, Plath knew that poetry also had essential elements. 

I’ll close with a periodic table of poetry that Plath used in some of her college publications: Shakespearean sonnet structure. Here’s the first quatrain of her 1954 poem “Doom of Exiles,” which demonstrates how the strictures of poetic form offered Plath a looser confinement than scientific tables. (I’ve italicized the stressed syllables.) Each unit is a poetic foot, and each line conforms to the 5-foot pattern. But individual words can stretch across these units, and all lines need not have 5 beats. Even formal poets are free to break the rules:

Now we, | retur | ning  from | the vaul | ted  domes
Of our | colos | sal  sleep, | come home | to find
A tall | metro | polis | of  cat | acombs
Erec | ted  down | the gang | ways  of | our mind.

If nuclear physics splits the atom, formal poetry fits individual words to patterns. See if you can re-join the words I’ve split here.

–MB

SOURCES:
Sylvia Plath, The Bell Jar. 1963. New York: HarperPerennial, 2006.
Sylvia Plath, Collected Poems. New York: 1981. HarperPerennial, 1992.
Photograph of Hubert Alyea from LIFE.com

 

SHTEM: Humanities Meets Engineering

SHTEMIf you’re a teacher in these times, you hear early and often that STEM is what education is now all about. It’s STEM to the brim–more science, technology, engineering & math–and a requiem for Arts and Humanities. Indeed there are so many calls for “more STEM!” and its efficiencies that Monty Python’s song for more Spam seems downright deficient. But this narrow way of thinking isn’t good for education–including the STEM disciplines.

STEM shouldn’t be about Us vs. Them. Our colleagues in the Arts and Art humanities1Education have countered this thinking head on with their acronym STEAM: adding the Arts to power STEM with creativity. I’m on board with this broad-minded approach to learning. And I’ll add SHTEM to the mix: powering STEM with the historical, cultural, and conceptual thinking of the Humanities. It’s a strategic mode of creative thinking that can power future designers, entrepreneurs, and inventors in the STEM professions. It’s a mode of thinking that draws on aesthetics, rhetoric, gender theory, history, and sociology to show students how to tailor their ideas to particular audiences for specific purposes: whether that audience is a governing board, a manufacturer, or a niche market.

I’m involved in the IMOS initiative here at UF, which brings together faculty in Materials Science Engineering, Anthropology, Classics, English, History, and Sociology in partnership with the Center for the Humanities and the Public Sphere. We’re reinventing freshman education for engineers with our interdisciplinary perspectives and case studies. Engineering students learn the anthropological concept of entanglement, the Classical uses of concrete to create social spaces, the modernist aesthetics of household plastics, the cyborg effects of semiconductors on social relations. And much more! Soon I’ll be joining colleagues from Team IMOS to give a pedagogy workshop for the Materials Research Society meeting in Boston. (We’re funded by MRS and NSF, and had seed money from a UF Creative Campus Catalyst grant.) We’ll show up with plenty of SHTEM, and we look forward to learning from our colleagues in science and engineering.  -MB